Authors

Ohood ElBasheer
Mohamed Yousef
Ahmed Abukonna
Ikhlas Abdelaziz
Nasraldeen Alnaeem
Mahasin Gamalalddin

Institutions

Sudan university of science and technology, Khartoum, Sudan

Batterjee Medical College, Jeddah, KSA
Qassim University, Saudi Arabia

Logo
  • Currently 4.76/5
  • 1
  • 1
  • 2
  • 2
  • 3
  • 3
  • 4
  • 4
  • 5
  • 5

Rating: 4.8/5 (25 votes cast)

Theme

Diagnostic & Interventional Radiology

Title

Study of anatomical variation of PNS in adult Saudi resident Pt with rhinosinusitis using CT

Background

Computed tomography has become method of the choice for diagnosing and treatment of para nasal sinuses disease and detecting anatomical variation, CT produces a volume of data that can be manipulated through a process known as windowing in order to demonstrate various PNS structures. Protocols should done for PNS are Axial , Coronal, Sagittal. 

Summary of Work

This study aimed to characterize the most common PNS anatomical variation in Saudi resident Patients with rhinosinusitis using computed tomography (CT).  The present study was cross-sectional hospital-based study of   392 patients, 272 males, and 120 females, referred for CT scan of PNS was conducted from 2017 to 2019, this study was done in Riyadh Hospitals, Saudi Arabia, mostly from Consultant Radiologists Diagnostic Center selected all complaining from rhinosinusitis using Toshiba Alexion 16 slice. The images were evaluated for the presence of any anatomical variants in paranasal sinuses, data were analyzed using SPSS. The results of this study revealed that the absolute frequency of anatomical variations was 91.3% were deviated nasal septum, concha bullosa seen in 50.77%, Basal lamella pneumatization found in 5.36 %. The superior turbinates were pneumatized in 20.15%, The crista galli was pneumatized in 19.39%. Frontal sinus was hyperpneumatized in 8.67% and nonpneumatized in 4.85%, the middle turbinate found to be paradoxical in shape in 10.71 %. lamina papyrecia dehiscence in 1.79%, inferior turbinate was pneumatized in 1.28%. The frontal air-cell was not present in our studied group. The supraorbital air-cell was present in 16.07% The Onodi air-cell found to be present in 12.24%. The Haller air-cell found to be present in 30.10%. The sphenoid sinus is laterally pneumatized in 7.65%. The depth of cribriform plate (Keros classification) was in 0.51%, The agger cells found to be presented in 51.02%, The infraorbital air-cell was present in 10.20%,nasal septum spur was presented in 29.34%, prominent ethmoidal bulla was presented in 29.85%, uncinate process was pneumatized in 12.76%,sphenoid sinus extension into posterior nasal septum is presented in 36.22%, posterior floor of cellaturcica was pneumatized in 30.87%, the pterygoid process was pneumatized in 7.91%,anterior clinoid process  was pneumatized in 10.97%, hard palate was pneumatized in 9.18% and lastly sphenoid septum change the direction in 8.16%. This study concluded that Anatomical variations of paranasal sinuses are best depicted on MDCT scan of PNS.Deviated nasal septum is the commonest anatomical variation (93.11%) followed by agger nasi cell (51.02) and concha bullosa (50.77%).

Summary of Results

Distribution of the anatomical variations

Anatomical variation

Frequency

Percentage%

DNS   

358

91.3

Agger cell            

200

51.02

Concha  bullosa        

199

50.77

Sphenoid sinus extension into posterior nasal septum

142

36.22

Pnemotization posterior floor of cellaturcica

121

30.87

Hallar cell                            

118

30.10

Prominent ethimoidal bulla              

117

29.85

Nasal septum spur

115

29.34

Superior turbinatespneumatization

79

20.15

Crista galipneumatization

76

19.39

Supraorbital air-cell                           

63

16.07

Uncinate process pneumatization

50

12.76

Onodi cell

48

12.24

Pnemotization anterior clinoid process        

43

10.97

Paradoxical middle  turbinate        

42

10.71

Infraorbital air cell                        

40

10.20

Hard palate pneumatization

36

9.18

Frontal sinus hyper pneumatization

34

8.67

Sphenoid septum direction

32

8.16

Pnemtizationptrigoid process            

31

7.91

Sphenoid lateral pneumatization

30

7.65

Basal lamella pneumatization

21

5.36

Non pneumtized frontal sinus

19

4.85

Lamina papyracea dehiscence

7

1.79

Inferior turbinate pneumatization

5

1.28

Keros classification                   

2

0.51

Frontal air cell                          

0

0.00

Conclusion

* Anatomical variation of the PNS is very important to be identified preoperatively.

* Anatomical variations found to be different among regions and countries, In our study we found all Pt with rhinosinusitis has one or more than one anatomic variant mentioned. *Anatomical variations of paranasal sinuses are best depicted on MDCT scan of PNS.

*Deviated nasal septum is the commonest anatomical variation (93.11%) followed by agger nasi cell (51.02) and concha bullosa (50.77%).

References

  • Adeel M, Rajput MS, Akhter S, Ikram M, Arain A,. (2013) Anatomical variations of nose and para nasal sinuses; CT scan review. Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association 63(3): 317.
  • Al Abri R, Bhargava D, Al-Bassam W, Al Badaai Y, Sawhney S (2014) Clinically significant anatomical variants of the paranasal sinuses. Oman Med J 29(2): 110-113.  
  • Al-Qudah MA (2010) Anatomical variations in sinonasal region: A computer tomography (CT) study. J Med J 44(3): 290-297.
  • Alrumaih RA, Mona M Ashoor, Ahmed A Ob (2016). Radiological sinonasal anatomy. Exploring the Saudi population. Saudi Med J 37: 521-526.
  • Fadda GL, Rosso S, Aversa S (2012): Multi parametric statistical correlations between paranasal sinus anatomic variations and chronic rhinosinusitis. ActaOtorhinolaryngol Ital; 32(4):244–51
  • Ibrahim S, Saud A, Jibril H (2018). Anatomical Variations of Paranasal Sinuses Gender and Age Impact. Glob J Oto 2018; 14(1): 555877. DOI: 10.19080/GJO..14.555877

Take-home Messages

Natural home ventilation will save your PNS healthy.

Acknowledgement

First and above all, thanks and praises to Allah, the almighty for providing me this opportunity and granting me the capability to proceed successfully, and the prayers and peace be upon the merciful prophet Mohamed. I want to express my sincere thanks and deep graduate to my colleagues whom help me in my study. I would also like to pass my special thanks to my supervisors, Sudan University of Science and Technology.

Background
Summary of Work

Summary of Results
Conclusion
References
Take-home Messages
Acknowledgement
Send ePoster Link